There are various forms in which you can structure a lawyer and even appoint more than one agent to work on you. You may want to do this for many reasons. Many people are more secure in understanding that their agents have to reach a common consensus before voting. But for your officers, it can be a complicated arrangement, mainly if they live in various locations or do not want to agree on some topics.

Most agents—how it should work

If you assign two or more agents in a lawyer’s office, the so-called ‘competitive firm’ usually demands that all agents sign up for all transactions. In a future that’s ideal, the agents are smart and do not disagree with each other. This does not necessarily exist, though. If your agents disagree, your first step should be to clarify your desires with you. However, you might not be able to articulate them at this moment. In this situation, the officers should obtain a credible lawyer’s advice. If the dilemma is critical financially, they might even recommend hiring their lawyers.

Options for an insurmountable controversy

Often it’s too hard to settle a conflict between agents, and a judge must rule. In a shared court, rather than a court of law, a disagreement over a lawyer’s jurisdiction is heard. While this can sound like a big difference, it implies that instead of money, the aim is to take a specific action or inaction. The first step in settling the conflict is to appeal to the equity court where you work. There could be a local county court or a fair tribunal. If you cannot attend, the Court appoints someone who is regarded as the lawyer’s custodial ad litem to serve your best interests. Each side would have an opportunity, including whether the dispute should be settled in its favor, to bring its case before the Court. Therefore, the ad litem would have a chance to analyze and recommend the Court about the facts and the details involved in this case. Please notice that judicial interference is a cumbersome and costly way of dealing with a conflict. If one of the agents doesn’t think that two attorneys are working, they would be smarter to retreat. Alternatively, since this substantially decreases the likelihood of the dispute, you might recommend nominating agents to serve one at a time.